It no longer requires God as creator or designer (Mayr 2001, p. The theory of evolution by natural selection explains the adaptedness and diversity of the world solely materialistically. Not a single person! Mayr defines evolution, which he calls “Darwinism,” as the rejection of all supernatural phenomena and causations. In 1971, Mayr claimed that he did “not know of a single well-informed person who questions the factuality of evolution” (Mayr, 1971, p. He has been claiming this for over 40 years-in 1967 he wrote that “evolution is accepted by every scientist” and for this reason it is no longer necessary to “enumerate painstakingly the proofs for evolution” (Mayr, 1967, p. Mayr declared that “no educated person any longer questions the validity of the so-called theory of evolution, which we now know to be a simple fact” (Mayr, 2001, p. The late Ernst Mayr, Alexander Agassiz Professor of Zoology at Harvard University, is “one of the most influential evolutionary theorists of our time” (Ferris, 2001, p. Ashtaroth’s claim is exactly the opposite of the truth, which is that “almost no scientist puts any stock in any other attempted explanation for the diversity of life-especially creationism” ( accessed May 28, 2004, p. The author then makes the following absolutist statement: Evolution is taken as a fact-and while there might be disagreements about some of the details of how evolution proceeds, there are no disagreements about the idea that it does occur and that it is the explanation for the diversity of life on our planet. It also isn’t really questioned in the other natural sciences, either, like physics or chemistry. Modern biology is basically unthinkable outside of the context of evolution and that is why it is accepted without reservations by pretty much every working scientists in the life sciences. In an article refuting “wiccan creationism,” the author claimed thatĮvolutionary theory has been confirmed to such a high degree and has such great explanatory power that it is the central organizing principle of the biological sciences today. Other writers avoid the words “all” or “no scientist” and claim instead that “almost no scientist” rejects Darwinism as defined above. Steve Jones, Professor of Genetics at University College of London, wrote that “no scientist denies the central truth of The Origin, the idea of descent with modification… plants, animals and everything else descended from a common ancestor” (Jones, 2000, pp. It is commonly claimed that no scientist rejects macroevolution or Darwinism (by which is meant evolutionary naturalism, or the view that variation caused by mutations plus natural selection accounts for all life forms). A Select List of Science Academics, Scientists, and Scholars Who are Skeptical of Darwinism
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |